"During my long journey through the world of evil, I had discovered three sources of power: the power of an individual's inner freedom, the power of a free society, and the power of the solidarity of the free world."-- Natan Sharansky, "The Case for Democracy"

Buy "The Case for Democracy"

View NASA picture


CONTACT:
jk [at] threesources [dot] com
AlexC [at] threesources [dot] com
JohnGalt [at] threesources [dot] com

AlexC Bio
jk Bio
Johngalt Bio
LatteSipper Bio
Cyrano Bio

November 7, 2009

What are You In For, Kid?

"Not having health care."

PELOSI: Buy a $15,000 Policy or Go to Jail

JCT Confirms Failure to Comply with Democrats’ Mandate Can Lead to 5 Years in Jail
Friday, November 06, 2009

Today, Ranking Member of the House Ways and Means Committee Dave Camp (R-MI) released a letter from the non-partisan Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) confirming that the failure to comply with the individual mandate to buy health insurance contained in the Pelosi health care bill (H.R. 3962, as amended) could land people in jail. The JCT letter makes clear that Americans who do not maintain “acceptable health insurance coverage” and who choose not to pay the bill’s new individual mandate tax (generally 2.5% of income), are subject to numerous civil and criminal penalties, including criminal fines of up to $250,000 and imprisonment of up to five years.


No surprise to ThreeSources, all government mandates are ultimately enforced by guns and jail time. I wonder that some enterprising 527 could not make a good TV commercial by juxtaposing this with footage of Then-Senator Obama ridiculing rival candidate Clinton for mandates.

Hat-tip: Ann Althouse who asks "Is this what the Democrats mean to inflict on the unsuspecting public that believes it is getting health care? What chaos lies ahead?"


November 6, 2009

I Saved or Created 11 Jobs Today!

Pretty good day for me. I completed a project that will keep my boss from being fired. Then I refrained from sending ten emails accusing my coworkers of embezzlement and sexual harassment that could have got them all fired. So I am counting myself as up eleven.

Not quite as good as North Chicago:

More than $4.7 million in federal stimulus aid so far has been funneled to schools in North Chicago, and state and federal officials say that money has saved the jobs of 473 teachers.

Problem is, the district employs only 290 teachers.

"That other number, I don't know where that came from," said Lauri Hakanen, superintendent of North Chicago Community Unit Schools District 187.

The Obama administration last week released the first round of data designed to underpin the worthiness of its economic stimulus plan, which so far has directed $1.25 billion to Illinois schools. That money has helped save or create 14,330 school jobs in the state, the administration claimed.


This got me thinking of CNN News-whatchamacallit Susan Roesgen, thinking a tea partier was insane because Illinois was lined up to get so much Federal Jack -- surely Lincoln would approve:

And it's saved more jobs than there are!

Posted by John Kranz at 6:42 PM | What do you think? [0 comments]

A Few Districts in the Old Dominion

It's Friday and jk is linking to Kim Strassel.

She looks at a few districts in Virginia, compares their 2008 and 2009 voting patterns, and proclaims a tipping point on heath care and the entire Obama agenda:

The White House and the congressional leadership saw this coming, and it is why Speaker Nancy Pelosi is force-marching her health bill to a vote tomorrow. She's not about to give her members time to absorb the ugly results, or to be further rattled by next week's Veteran's Day break, when they go home for a repeat of the August furies. If not now, she knows, maybe never.

Look for it, nonetheless, to be a squeaker. A lot of Democrats are getting a sneaky suspicion Mrs. Pelosi is willing to sacrifice their seats on the altar of liberal government health care. Combined with the election results and Mr. Obama's falling poll numbers, this is no recipe for loyalty. Hello, tipping point. Hello, even crazier Washington.


Awesome as usual.


November 5, 2009

Freedom on the March

Sad that President Obama could not find the time to celebrate the fall of the Berlin Wall in Berlin. But glad Chancellor Angela Merkel addressed a joint session of Congress:

[F]or me America seemed completely out of reach . . . then on the 9th of November 1989, the Berlin Wall fell.

And this border which had divided a nation, for decades, keeping people in two different worlds, was now open. And this is why for me, today is first and foremost a time to say thank you.

I thank all those American and Allied pilots who heard and heeded the desperate appeal of then-Mayor of Berlin Ernst Reuter, in 1948, who said, you, the nations of this world, cast your eyes towards the city.

For months, these pilots flew food to Berlin for the airlift, saving the citizens from starvation. Many of these soldiers risked their lives. Dozens lost their lives. We shall remember and honor them forever . . .

I think of John F. Kennedy, who won the hearts of the Berliners, when, during his visit in 1961, after the wall had been built, he reached out to the desperate citizens of Berlin by saying, "Ich bin ein Berliner." I think of Ronald Reagan, who, far earlier than most, clearly saw the sign of the times and, standing in front of the Brandenburg Gate, already in 1987, called out, "Mr. Gorbachev, open this gate. Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall." This appeal shall remain forever in my heart.


Third Bush Term

Here's another rousing cheer for the Obama Administration: American Magazine says that he will be continuing "the failed policies of the Bush Administration" for Four More Years!

Reading the climate-change news in recent weeks, one might wonder who won the last election.

The Obama administration has rejected the Kyoto Protocol (ensuring it will expire), adopted some of former President George W. Bush’s key positions in international climate negotiations, and demurred when asked about reports that the president has decided to skip the December climate summit in Copenhagen. United Nations climate negotiator Yvo de Boer has concluded that it is “unrealistic” to expect the conference to produce a new, comprehensive climate treaty—which also describes the once-fond hopes for passage of domestic climate legislation this year—or even in Obama’s first term.


One Year

One year after the election, he's still campaigning.

But johngalt thinks:

Do you suppose he'll campaign for re-election 3 years hence on the same theme? Or even a year from now, stump for more Democrats in Congress to "help me recover from what Bush did for the last 8... uh, 8 of the last 10 years?"

Posted by: johngalt at November 5, 2009 3:09 PM

George Orwell Call Your Office

John Nolte at Andrew Breitbart's Big Hollywood has 11 of these, he ranks from Really, Really Bad to Worst. But I demand a recount, none were worse than this:


Barack Obama there is none higher
Other politicians should call me sire
To burn my kingdom you must use fire
I create change till I retire!

Democratic Party come correct
Our cuts are on time our rhymes connect
Got the right to vote and will elect
Others can’t feel us but give us respect

Now I walked through crowds, shook many hands
Spent my time saying YES WE CAN!
I stood on many stages, held many mics
Took airplane flights at great heights
PA and Jersey, I won that fight

Chicago Illinois was so hype
Moving so strong
Biden joined the fight
Now we are a team and we ignite!

Now I crash through walls,
Cut through floors,
Burst through ceilings
Knock down doors.

He is George
And I’m Turan
We’re never far behind
In class we shine
For every living person
With dreams and plans

Keep hope alive –
Think “Yes We Can”

We’re the baddest of the bad
The cool of the cool
I’m Barack
I rock and rule.

I’m Joe. I rock and rule.
It’s not a trick or treat or April fools,
It’s all brand new
With a little old school.

We’ve got the music and the message
For all my friends.
Check us out on the internet,
Load and send.

Music ain’t nothing
but a peoples jam.
It’s President Obama

Rockin’ with the band!


Nice telecaster, though...

Posted by John Kranz at 10:48 AM | What do you think? [0 comments]

Quote of the Day

Chrysler to break out new "Ram" line of trucks. If they'd called it the Rahm line I'd really start to worry about politicization. ... -- Mickey Kaus. Who knew a pundit that mixed automobiles and politics would become so vital?
Posted by John Kranz at 10:32 AM | What do you think? [0 comments]

Happy Days are Here Again

You just get dizzy comparing press coverage of the economy before and after Jan 20, 2009: AP:

New jobless claims drop to 512K, lowest since Jan.

WASHINGTON – The number of newly laid-off workers filing claims for unemployment benefits last week fell to the lowest level in 10 months, evidence that job cuts are easing as the economy slowly heals.


Only a half million new unemployment claims this month (well, a little more but who's counting). I guess all the Stimulus worked!

Posted by John Kranz at 10:17 AM | What do you think? [2 comments]
But Perry Eidelbus thinks:

During the 2001 recession, leftist economists and pundits looking to blame Bush often claimed that jobless claims above 400,000 meant that unemployment was increasing, and anything below 400,000 meant unemployment was decreasing.

I don't know if that was actually true, but let's hold them to their own standard. The population is about 7.7% larger today. Correspondingly, why aren't the same economists and pundits talking about jobless claims above 430K indicating rising unemployment?

Which, of course, means that "512K, lowest since Jan." is very grim news.

Posted by: Perry Eidelbus at November 5, 2009 12:09 PM
But jk thinks:

It seems even during the expansion, the same AP would tsk, tsk the addition of 200K jobs. So, plus 200 was subpar, negative 500 is cause to pop the corks!

Posted by: jk at November 5, 2009 12:26 PM

November 4, 2009

Jobs Saved

I don't think any ThreeSourcers were fooled by the "jobs saved or created:" lingo, but I'll recommend Prof Mankiw or The Everyday Economist for serious debunking.

Me, I'll just enjoy some anecdotal evidence :

WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama's economic recovery program saved 935 jobs at the Southwest Georgia Community Action Council, an impressive success story for the stimulus plan. Trouble is, only 508 people work there.

Or:
Moore's slice of the stimulus came in an $889.60 order from the Army Corps of Engineers for nine pairs of work boots for a stimulus project.

Moore says he’s been supplying the Corps with boots for at least two decades. This year, because he provided safety shoes for work funded by the stimulus package, he said he got a call from the Corps telling him he had to fill out a report for Recovery.gov detailing how he’d used the $889.60, and how many jobs it had helped him to create or save. He later got another call, asking him if he’d finished the report.

"The paperwork was unreal," said Moore, who added that he tried to figure out how to file the forms online, then gave up and asked his daughter to help.

But johngalt thinks:

Don't you see, Moore's is the job that was "saved" and his daughter's was the job "created." He's cranky now but wait until the IRS contacts him about failure to withold from his daughter's paychecks. Hint: In-kind payment still has a dollar value.

Honestly, all of the government jobs to count the Stimulus "benefit" is the main source of job creation.

Posted by: johngalt at November 5, 2009 3:00 PM

November 3, 2009

Let Freedom Ring!

We have not had too much good news, I will make the most of it.

Blue Dogs would be dog-foolish to ignore the off year elections. Now, Leader Reid says they'll debate health care while looking down the barrel of midterms.

WASHINGTON – In a blow to the White House, the Senate's top Democrat signaled Tuesday that Congress may fail to meet a year-end deadline for passing health care legislation, leaving the measure's fate to the uncertainties of the 2010 election season.

UPDATE: James Pethokoukis 10 quick observations about Election Day, 2009

UPDATE II: Michael Barone underscores that the results imperil health care legislation:

I cannot imagine that Congressmen Nye, Perriello, Connally and Boucher have not already accessed the websites which have shown the position of their constituents in a contest which, while like all governorship contests has its own specific features, was also in its contrast on issue positions reasonably congruent with those prevailing on national issues. And I can certainly respond with sympathy if any or all of these incumbents responded to these numbers with a two-word comment of which I will relay only the first word which is, “Oh.”

The 2009 election results are certainly not going to make it easy for Speaker Nancy Pelosi to round up the needed 218 votes for Democrats’ health care bills.


He also mentions Westchester County, a race that brought a cautiously optimistic email from Perry.

But Terri thinks:

Longmont, to me, was as big as VA and NJ as far as a ray of sunshine in this country! Tonight the grownups won and won in a big way here.

Posted by: Terri at November 4, 2009 12:28 AM
But johngalt thinks:

Longmont race news here:
http://www.timescall.com/news_story.asp?ID=19036

I don't know any of the Longmont candidates or positions but I did very much like this report:

"Boulder County voters also appear to be turning down the request to extend an open space tax."

Proving you can fool most Boulder County people only 19 out of 20 times.

Posted by: johngalt at November 4, 2009 1:18 AM
But nanobrewer thinks:


What was with Benker, and a lawsuit against Firestone?!? I've been out of the State for nearly half the year, so have no idea what's been going on to the town just north of "my town."

Posted by: nanobrewer at November 4, 2009 11:26 AM
But Terri thinks:

Short version:

A megachurch bought land east of Longmont and wanted to develop it and annex to Longmont. Longmont said yes. A petition was started to say no and elections held in 2008 ended up in a new council changing their minds and saying no.

The church said, "Ok" and convinced Firestone to annex the land.

Then there is something with multiple annexations and rights of ways, but bottom line, the old city council was suing to keep Firestone away from the Longmont border.

Posted by: Terri at November 4, 2009 1:25 PM
But johngalt thinks:

Speaking of good news, this 2-week old Karen Travers post on Jake Tapper's 'Political Punch' is the 2nd "most Dugg" story on ABCnews.com.

"Vice President Joe Biden said today that if Democrats were to lose 35 House seats they currently hold in traditionally Republican districts, it would mean doomsday for President Obama’s agenda.

Biden said Republicans are pinning their political strategy on flipping these seats.

“If they take them back, this the end of the road for what Barack and I are trying to do,” the vice president said at a fundraiser for Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ) today in Greenville, Delaware."

I hope they continue to push just as hard next year for climate change schemes and healthcare reforms, but with exactly the same degree of legislative success.

Posted by: johngalt at November 4, 2009 3:15 PM

More to life than politics

I love this country! Hat-tip: Galley Slaves

But johngalt thinks:

"When anvil shooting is outlawed, only outlaws will shoot anvils."

On a related note, our local Wal Mart finally has a wide selection of pistol ammunition in stock: .22LR, .38 Special, 9mm Luger, .45 ACP and others that I WASN'T interested in. Get your Christmas shopping done early this year!

Posted by: johngalt at November 3, 2009 6:03 PM
But jk thinks:

Don't forget .357 Magnum Santa!

Posted by: jk at November 3, 2009 6:17 PM
But johngalt thinks:

Well, I'll just have to go back!

Posted by: johngalt at November 4, 2009 1:19 AM
But Keith thinks:

jk: Arnold's Rule of Gunfights #8: never go into a gunfight with a handgun whose caliber does not start with at least a four. If you're looking for a recommendation, I'm a big fan if the Sig Sauer P229 DAK in the .40 flavor.

I'd ask Santa for that Mossberg Model 590 I've been drooling over, but I already know which of his two lists I'm on this year, and it would be futile.

TOTALLY loved the anvil video - and couldn't help thinking that somewhere in the New Mexico desert, there's a skinny coyote who's sure to find himself in its path once gravity asserts itself. I should probably have the print shop gin up his little sign...

Posted by: Keith at November 4, 2009 11:57 AM
But jk thinks:

Keith, my people will have enough firepower. I just don't like to get my hands dirty...

Posted by: jk at November 4, 2009 12:12 PM
But johngalt thinks:

And gunfights aren't the only uses for handguns. Anyone who's read "Unintended Consequences" knows the utility of the lowly .22 LR.

Posted by: johngalt at November 4, 2009 2:36 PM
But jk thinks:

Just what we needed, one more thing to fight about.

Wikipedia reports muzzle velocities of up to 1600 ft/sec on high load defense .357 Magnum cartridges, versus 1175 for the highest grain .40 S&W. Let the games begin!

Posted by: jk at November 4, 2009 4:35 PM

Quote of the Day Dos

Mister Taranto is in rare form today:

Virginia is one of two states that elect statewide officials a year after presidential elections, and in the governor's race, Republican Bob McDonnell looks to win big over Democrat Creigh Deeds. (We're not sure whether Creigh rhymes with "gay" or "brie.")


Boom and Bust?

In last Thursday's Quote of the Day Veronique de Rugy described how America is more and more resembling an Ayn Rand novel. (I think we all know which novel she refers to.) She correctly identified "crony capitalism" as the culprit and government manipulation as an essential ingredient for said cronyism but I took her to task for her examples: Bailouts. Not to defend government bailouts but the best example of crony capitalism I can think of at the moment is how the mortgage crisis was 100 percent engineered by government regulation.

Brother Silence agreed in the comments, saying that government made sure the banks made loans that were not discriminatory against the poor (because we all know it's not their poorness that keeps them from repaying their debt?) But I was befuddled when our good brother lept from this obviously flawed economic transaction - flawed from the standpoint of a private lender ever receiving his principal back, with or without interest - to blame the mortgage meltdown on "the boom and bust effect." There is no denying the fact that financial professionals did their level best to profit from the preordained train wreck set in motion by our friends on the Senate Banking Committee, among others, but is it not also obvious to everyone that without said foolish lending "thou shalts" the opportunity wouldn't have existed in the first place?

The only way for government to fix the economy is to stop "fixing" the economy. Or am I mistaken?

UPDATE: I also meant to include excerpts from this Robert Skidelsky article I found on boom/bust cycles:

It is impossible to imagine a continuous gale of creative destruction taking place except in a context of boom and bust. Indeed, early theorists of business cycles understood this.

(...)

These are efficient responses to changes in real wages. No intervention by government is needed. Bailing out inefficient automobile companies such as General Motors only slows down the rate of progress. In fact, whereas most schools of economic thought maintain that one of government's key responsibilities is to smooth the cycle, "real" business-cycle theory argues that reducing volatility reduces welfare!

It is hard to see how this type of theory either explains today's economic turbulence, or offers sound instruction about how to deal with it. First, in contrast to the dot-com boom, it is difficult to identify the technological "shock" that set off the boom. Of course, the upswing was marked by super-abundant credit. But this was not used to finance new inventions: it was the invention. It was called securitised mortgages. It left no monuments to human invention, only piles of financial ruin.

There are those pesky bailouts again! But Skidelsky's point is that it's hard to have a boom-bust cycle in something where there is no production to boom and then bust.

But jk thinks:

I do remember the comment. I considered it a duty of the blog to reply with a link to Austrian Business Cycle Thoery nad you have caught me in my failure.

Here's a nice, short and accessible overview from the Mises Institute.

Posted by: jk at November 3, 2009 3:44 PM
But Perry Eidelbus thinks:

Remember, "financial professionals" does not necessarily mean, and today typically does not mean, "free-market capitalists."

I had been working off and on on quite a lengthy comment to what you guys had left there, but I found my work PC rebooted one morning and lost the Notepad session I was using to write the comment offline. I'll do it this week sometime.

Posted by: Perry Eidelbus at November 3, 2009 4:16 PM

Quote of the Day

Tim Flannery, the jet-setting doomsaying global warm-monger from down under, was in Ottawa the other day promoting his latest eco-tract, and offered a few thoughts on “Copenhagen”—which is transnational-speak for December’s UN Convention on Climate Change. “We all too often mistake the nature of those negotiations in Copenhagen,” remarked professor Flannery. “We think of them as being concerned with some sort of environmental treaty. That is far from the case. The negotiations now ongoing toward the Copenhagen agreement are in effect diplomacy at the most profound global level. They deal with every aspect of our life and they will influence every aspect of our life, our economy, our society.” -- Mark Steyn in a home run column on enviro-totalitarianism.
Hat-tip: A good friend of ThreeSources by email.
Posted by John Kranz at 10:56 AM | What do you think? [0 comments]

November 2, 2009

A Philosophical Ramble

Ulysses Grant drops an interesting line in his (awesome, awesome, awesome) autobiography. He says -- during an uncharacteristic digression in the middle of military history -- that he "always thought the South could profit from defeat." He explains that the Confederate States were built on an inferior economic system and that both slaves and non-property holding whites would be better off under the North's economic system.

I'd suggest that the bulk of the country today, myself included, agrees with that. I got to wondering why "enforcing our values and way of life" is accepted for slave-holding States who were following the United States Constitution, but it was not acceptable for us to impose those same values on the indigenous peoples of America who had generally far worse governments than Mississippi, South Carolina, and Alabama. I’m very sympathetic to those who feel that the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments were forced on the returning States. But I think that is a procedural question, the abolition of chattel slavery by force is accepted mainstream thought.

This is the kind of thought that will ensure that I never hold elective office. If anybody wants to throw their futures away in the comments, I'd be extremely interested.

Rant Posted by John Kranz at 6:43 PM | What do you think? [3 comments]
But T. Greer thinks:

I got to wondering why "enforcing our values and way of life" is accepted for slave-holding States who were following the United States Constitution, but it was not acceptable for us to impose those same values on the indigenous peoples of America who had generally far worse governments than Mississippi, South Carolina, and Alabama.

Simple: because we never did such thing in the first place?

Lets take the Cherokee as an example. We did not enforce our values on the Cherokoee. Heck, they tried their best to emulate the Western example, inventing a syllabary alphabet, published their own newspaper, built upwards of 60 black smith shops, and wrote their own constitution. How did we reward the adoption of our ways? We killed their leaders, took their land, and forced them to move a thousand miles away to federally defined and enforced reservations.

Forgive me for sounding like Howard Zinn, but this is exactly what we did. We did not play the role of a benign enforcer of proper morality and governance. Following the Jackson administration, we took indigenous property, broke treaties with indigenous peoples, and destroyed the liberty of indigenous peoples. We did not impose values. We betrayed them.

Posted by: T. Greer at November 2, 2009 10:36 PM
But jk thinks:

Can't argue. I'm most disappointed with the abrogation of treaties (and the 11th Amendment denying them a chance at redress). I don't think Howard Zinn and your local History Professor would agree that we should have simply conquered and forced assimilation.

But the real anger at American policy that I read and see is not that -- it is the subjugation of their lifestyle: our (and it's always second person) enforcing our values on another culture. Who are we?

In my darker moments, I answer that "we" were the guys who created the free business climate that enables Sam Colt to invent interchangeable parts.

Reading about Tecumseh's brother, "The Shawnee Prophet," I have been held captive by the disconnect between the numinous native American of today's history and media compared with the reality of tribal rule that recognized no minority rights and was less of a stranger to atrocities than our history.

It's quite possible that I have rebelled against the Kevin Costner vision too far and have lost center. It doesn't help that the topic is so taboo I feel guilty typing this. There's no search for truth.

Posted by: jk at November 3, 2009 11:30 AM
But T. Greer thinks:

Fair enough. Your right of course -- if the Indians owned slaves (some of the afore mentioned Cherokee did, oddly enough), the men in blue would not be celebrated for forcing a "more just value system" upon the Indians.

Along a similar vein of thought is this: if the slaves of early American republic were multiracial, would academics still be so angry about the subject? At times I can't help but think that it is not the restriction of liberty the racism of the slavers that so disgusts progressive-types.

Posted by: T. Greer at November 4, 2009 11:15 PM

Quote of the Day

Malaria is only weakly related to temperature; it is strongly related to poverty. It has risen in sub-Saharan Africa over the past 20 years not because of global warming, but because of failing medical response. The mainstay treatment, chloroquine, is becoming less and less effective. The malaria parasite is becoming resistant, and there is a need for new, effective combination treatments based on artemisinin, which is unfortunately about 10 times more expensive.

Mr. Samson is right to ask what spending money on global warming could do for him and his family. The truthful answer? Very little. For a lot less, we could achieve a lot more. -- Bjorn Lomborg

But Keith thinks:

Well, hell. All this time I've been thinking that the rise in sub-Saharan Africa of malaria was the result of the refusal to kill the mosquitos with DDT - an inexpensive and highly effective mosquito slayer, far more so than the highly entertaining Bug-Zapper™ on my back porch. By all means, if malaria is strongly related to poverty, then by all means, we must transfer untold boatloads of American wealth to Africa to rid the continent of the scourge of malaria.

Somebody had to say it. May as well be me.

Posted by: Keith at November 2, 2009 5:13 PM
But jk thinks:

Complete agreement on malaria and DDT. But that is one of the things that makes Lomborg so significant: he believes in global warming, he is not against a bit of wealth redistribution, he's a gay European environmentalist!

This underscores his belief that there are far better things to focus on than global warming. I enjoyed his personification of Samson -- environmentalists love to care for mythic aggregations at the expense of real individual people. I never mind reminding people of that.

Posted by: jk at November 2, 2009 6:43 PM

A: Eleventy-One!

Q: Frodo, how many new bureaucracies would be created by Speaker Pelosi's new health care bill?

Hat-tip: @mkhammer


Worst Bill Evah

"The health bill [Speaker Pelosi] unwrapped last Thursday, which President Obama hailed as a 'critical milestone,' may well be the worst piece of post-New Deal legislation ever introduced." So begins a long and thoughtful editorial in the Wall Street Journal today -- and it does not let up from there.

The editors enumerate its flaws and suggest -- rightfully -- that the flaws are features, not bugs: the goal is to complete FDR's vision.

Mr. Obama rode into office on a wave of "change," but we doubt most voters realized that the change Democrats had in mind was making health care even more expensive and rigid than the status quo. Critics will say we are exaggerating, but we believe it is no stretch to say that Mrs. Pelosi's handiwork ranks with the Smoot-Hawley tariff and FDR's National Industrial Recovery Act as among the worst bills Congress has ever seriously contemplated.

Full of choir preachin' for ThreeSourcers, but if you are looking for a serious article to share with someone in the other side, this one is very very good.


October 31, 2009

Halloween Thought

@michellebranch: Do slutty girls wear normal clothes on Halloween?
Have a great one, y'all!
Posted by John Kranz at 6:04 PM | What do you think? [2 comments]
But Perry Eidelbus thinks:

I celebrated my ninth straight year of not having to run to the front door all evening long! Ah, the benefits of a private road...

Posted by: Perry Eidelbus at November 2, 2009 10:59 AM
But jk thinks:

Hmmm. The condo is not well set up for trick-or-treating and I confess that I miss it.

Posted by: jk at November 2, 2009 11:54 AM

Don't click this. Comments (2)